Friday, March 30, 2012

Rear Window (1954)

The Classic Alfred Hitchcock film, "Rear Window," is about a wheel chair bound man named Jeff (Jimmy Stewart) who is so bored in his apartment, he finds himself spying on his neighbors in the apartment building across his rear window. It's mentioned in the beginning that he isn't ready for marriage, and thinks his girlfriend Lisa (Grace Kelly) is too 'perfect' and perhaps artificial to him. Aside from an assistant named Stella visiting him to help nurse his leg, he spends his hours alone, and looks through his rear window as if it is a television, and he can't stop spying. He sees a number of characters per apartment building: an attractive ballerina he calls 'miss torso', a childless couple with a scottie dog, a lonely middle aged woman who has dinner at her mom with an imaginary date, an old lady who spends her time sunbathing, a single male pianist, and a middle aged couple. His attention is focused on the middle aged couple, and he sees them have confrontations. He seems to hear sounds from all the separate homes in the complex, except for theirs. He can only examine their stressful body language. The different windows serve as different channels on a television being Jeff's rear window. Jeff falls asleep at nightfall and is suddenly awakened by a womans scream. He looks out the window onto the dark night to see it's raining, and suddenly spots the husband of the couple leave his apartment with a giant suitcase. Jeff immediately suspects that he has murdered his wife. Instead of being frightened and calling the police, he only consults a detective, who seems to think Jeff is jumping to conclusions. Jeff tries to tell his girlfriend what's going on, and is surprised to know shes interested when usually she is only interested in herself: fame, beauty and money. Jeff keeps seeing suspicious activity happen: the husband washing the suitcase, staying up late in the dark smoking a cigar, and no sign of the woman. The scottie dog belonging to the childless couple sniffs around a nearby garden patch as if something was recently buried there. The dog is later strangled to death, and Jeff assumes it was the murdering husband. Jeff finally convinces his girlfriend Lisa to sneak into the murdering husbands apartment to find any clue to the supposed murder. Jeff watches in fear, but does nothing to save his girlfriend. It's as if he is watching the windows of the apartments like it's the climax of a movie. The murderer eventually finds Jeffs girlfriend and beats her, until the police arrive and arrest him. It is through this experience of watching Lisa step out of her 'perfect world' to visit a forbidden territory, that Jeff falls in love with her, and decides to marry her. She is somewhat of a hero to him now, instead of just an object of luxery. I found this movie to be predictable, and not very frightening. It's interesting that Jeffs point of view is usually seen through his rear window, as he sees the lives of the other tenants while his is on hold. There aren't many surprises though, perhaps because this film was parodied in many television shows (i.e. the simpsons) and made in 1954. The only eerie parts were when the soundtrack played a roll. During the rainstorm where the murdered wife screams, there is a muttered fog horn in the distance, perhaps signaling a warning. Other than that, I found the film dull for a Hitchcock film, and underdeveloped.

Bowling for Columbine (2002)

The Michael Moore documentary "Bowling for Columbine" is about how the United States gun controls laws are too lax. The main focus is The Columbine Shooting which occurred April 20, 1999, and how easy is was for the two shooters (Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold) to obtain arms, even being under the age of 18. The documentary begins where Moore goes to a bank to buy a gun, and shows how easy it was. In a matter of minutes, he was holding his own rifle. Then the opening credits begin with archive footage of teenagers bowling. It was a myth for a certain number of years, that the Columbine boys went bowling before going on a suicide mission at their high school, though it was later found out to be false. Moore interviews several people on their opinions of gun laws in the United States. These people include, victims of Columbine, Timothy McVeighs old roommate James Nichols (pro gun red neck), Littleton, Colorado citizens, families in the military, Marilyn Manson, Dick Clark, and finally Charleton Heston (Then president of the National Gun/Rifle Association). Inbetween interviews, Michael Moore talks about gun related murders in the US per year on average, along with other outrageous statistics. He also puts in his own opinions as if they are facts, to further convey the message that the US is a gun-loving country who are unaware of the dangers we pose to ourselves and others. He adds archival footage of people being killed at gun point, old commercials for toy guns, 911 tapes from Columbine High School the day of the massacre, and violent news footage. He searches for other answers on "why" Harris and Klebold committed murder that day. He speculates, is it the violence in music, video games and tv? Is it because family values aren't well in tact? He finally comes to his own conclusion it's because this country lacks strict gun control laws. Though I do not completely agree with that conclusion being the main reason why School Shootings happen in general, his point comes across with the footage and interviews, exposing the thoughts of different groups in America. Finally, he decides to visit Charleton Heston at his home, to see if he can squeeze an apology from him. Charleton Heston is shown a picture of a 6 year old victim named Kayla Rowland who was shot by another 6 year old boy who found a gun at his moms boyfriends house. Without any apology, Charleton Heston walks away from Moore feeling insulted. Although Moore has a tendency to be an annoying whistle blower who may exaggerate the truth, his heart is in the right place in changing the US for the better. Moving and insightful documentary.

The Strangers (2008)

The Strangers, written and directed by Bryan Bertino, is a horror film based loosely on true events such as The Manson Family murders in 1969. A young couple (James and Kristen) retreat to a Jame's families vacation cabin in a desolate area, where James hoped they would celebrate an engagement, although Kristen declines. The film begins to take place around 4 am at night, where the couple awkwardly try to save their relationship, so the audience is preoccupied by the sadness between the two. Finally they start to make amends and begin to make love until they hear a loud bang on their front door. They open the door to see a 20 year old blonde haired girl in the shadows creepily asking them, "Is Tamara home?" Not knowing what this girl is talking about, they say "no you have the wrong house" and after a period of silence the girl asks, "are you sure?" Without the couple answering, the girl says, "see you later" and walks away. After that random interruption, the couple both seem tired and continue with small chit chat. Kristen says at one point, "I'm out of cigarettes..." and James offers to go buy some for her. After making a fire for her in the fire place, he leaves to go pick them up. Kristen is left idol in the house, puts on an eerie record playing the song, "the sprout and the bean" by Joanna Newsome http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHgyaVmkFzc. Kristen wanders around the small cabin looking at family pictures of her boyfriend, and plays a few notes slowly on an old piano. While looking closely at a corner of a wall in the house, marked with James heights, an even louder knock is heard on the front door. The song fades eerily as she slowly approaches the door, and without opening it, asks whos there. All she hears is the same girl asking, "Is Tamara home?" "You already came by here" Kristen replies. "Are you sure?" She hears back. The night continues in real time; a minute by minute account of Kristens and James point of view. It turns out there are two women and one man terrorizing the couple for fun, in unexpected ways. When they try to escape, the find that James' car windows have been broken and the tires slashed. They soon discover that although the doors in the house were locked, they find signs that the intruders were already in the house, and are toying with them. Some scenes show Kristen oblivious that the male intruder is right behind her in the house. As time goes by, James and Kristen come across all of the intruders. The two women are wearing pin up girl masks with dark hollow eye holes, and the man has a gray sack over his head with eye and mouth holes. At one point the two hide in a room with a loaded gun. At one point one of James friends comes to pick him up, because he got news of Kristens rejection. He soon notices that someone has broken into the home, yet slowly walks inside to see what's going on. As he proceeds into the home, an eerie country song plays on the record player, and there is a shot of the friend walking down a hallway with the male intruder quietly following him with an axe. As the friend approaches the room the two are hiding in, he is mistaken for one of the intruders, and shot in the head and instantly dies. After this part in the movie, the subtle scares turn into the couple literally running from the intruders to hide in a barn or the woods, with no way to call for help. The directer was successful in distracting the viewer before unexpectedly scaring the audience, which makes for a great horror movie. Finally the couple are seen tied up to chairs in their living room, with the three intruders staring at them with knives in their hands. Kristen and James don't know these people and try to plead with them, but to no avail. One of the women opens the curtains and for the first time in the movie, it's daylight, and the early rays soak up the dusty cabin. The three mythodically remove their masks, yet the audience doesn't see their faces. They brutally stab and kill the couple. The camera shows the outside of the cabin in it's secluded area, and the sounds of gut wrenching screams echo in the distance. The movie ends with two Christian boys going door to door to give out pamphlets. A beat up truck rolls down the quiet road, and one of the women killers gets out to talk to the boys. "Can I have one?" She says to one of the boys. He asks, "are you a sinner?" "sometimes" she responds. The audience only sees the back of this girls head. Afterwards, she gets back into the truck, where only the backs of the heads of the killers are. As they drive away, one of the women says, "It'll be easier next time." The boys later discover the cabin with the open door, and finds the bodies of the couple. Though it is a slow paced film, it captures the moment by moment suspense of a home intrusion victim. The audience is constantly sympathetic to what the couples fears are, and find themselves thinking, "what would i do in this situation?". You want the couple to escape but the sad yet somewhat gratifying truth is, they don't survive. There is a lack of gore, fictitious demons, and fast action. The main mood is constant fear and suspense, in one setting, leading the audience to only focus on the points of views of the victims. This is one of the best horror films I've seen in a long time.

127 Hours (2010)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljJM3mTBqJs 127 Hours is a true story of a rugged outdoors man named Aron Ralston. The film takes place in 2003, when he was hiking in southern Utah in a dessert. The beginning shows Aron ecstatic about escaping to the outdoors and drives his jeep to a desert like area with small canyons (some lead to waterfalls) to climb down. He ventures out in the wilderness alone and surprisingly runs into two girls his age, and takes them sight seeing for a while. After they part, he proceeds hiking in the middle of no where, and finds a canyon to climb down, hoping to land in a giant pool of water. Upon climbing down he comes across a boulder wedged between the walls of the canyon, and falls on top of him, knocking him to the bottom of the canyon trapping his right arm in the narrow space. All he has is his camera, a half full water bottle, rope with carabiners and a knife. He tries several times to push the boulder aside or crack it to escape, but he can't. He has to ration his water supply while being trapped so he can survive. The five and a half days he's stuck in the narrow canyon, he reflects on good memories, regrets, family, and love life and goes slightly crazy given the circumstances. The movie is pretty uneventful as James Franco (acting as Aron Ralston) mutters random thoughts and the movie shows flashbacks and images in his mind while enduring this experience. The movie tries to accurately convey what Arons personal experience was every moment he was stuck in the Canyon, though the events are limited. Though it is a struggle to watch the film without falling asleep, it doesn't sugarcoat or add fictional characters to the story of Aron, which makes the story more believable. It's not so much a depressing experience as it shows Aron in a daze, recording a video diary on his camera and even joking to himself about the situation. He laughs, "Sorry mom and dad, I wont be able to make it to my sisters rec idol, because I'll probably be dead." While he's in the Canyon, the camera takes closeups of his face, and not so much his arm caught in the boulder, though the audience knows it's there. At one point, the camera shows the inside of his almost empty water bottle as he drinks from it, giving a sense of extreme desperation. By the fifth day, Aron somehow gathers the strength to come to the conclusion that if he has any chance of surviving, he has to cut off his arm. With the sounds of the bones and flesh breaking, it makes the audience unable to watch or listen to. Eventually he climbs out of the canyon and is more happy to be alive than regretting that he no longer has his right arm. He walks away with a story, an experience, and knowledge, and gratitude for people and things in his life he took for granted before. The canyon scene is always dark with only a crack of sunlight, in a narrow space going at a slow pace. In contrast, when Arons free (before and after) everything seems to move at a radically swift and spontaneous pace, in an open desert drenched in sunlight. This gives the theme that you don't know what you got until it's gone. Though mostly boring, it was a true depiction of what Aron went through as a 2 hour summery of 127 hours caught in a canyon. I found it a moving film.

Kids (1995)

The 1995 Film "Kids" directed and written by Larry Clark, is a story about an amoral young teenager named Telly, who unknowingly has HIV, and has an addiction with having sex with as many virgins as possible. The film begins where he's convincing a 12 year old girl to have sex with him, and telling her sweet nothings about how he cares about her. After he takes her virginity, he leaves instantly and meets up with his friend Casper. He transforms from seemingly caring and a sensitive person to a dirty immature teenage boy as he brags about how he just added another girl to his "deflowering list". The camera pans the two boys walking down the streets of New York, talking about their plans to find more virgins to sleep with, using vulgar language describing what they fantasize to do to more girls. (Telly is in red and Casper is in white) After the 3 minute dialogue between the two, they patronize an Asian clerk at a convenience store and steal 40 oz beers. They proceed to go meet up with other male drifters in a grungy apartment building, to smoke pot, inhale ether, and drink, while continuing conversing with the other people about their sex lives, and how girls are nothing but objects. In between this scene, emerges another scene of a group of girls hanging out at another apartment, also talking about their sex lives in a rather vulgar manner, but not as vulgar and explicit as what the boys are talking about. The movie switches between both scenes, in a comparison of the two sexes. One of the girls, Jennie, mentions that she had sex only once with Telly, and says that after she lost her virginity to him, he never spoke to her again. She seems a little shy to talk about sex, and implies that she liked Telly. When the film switches back to the apartment where the boys are, Jennie calls and Telly says he's not interested in talking with her. The conversation in each apartment continues, and finally leads to one of the girls, Ruby to say that she and Jennie went to the clinic to get tested the week before and were going to find out the results that day. Afterwards, the boys say to each other, "Yeah STDS don't exist" the camera shows a shot of Telly listening and grinning like a fool, implying that he is carrying one. After the two scenes of the groups of boys and girls talking, Ruby finds out she has no STDS although she had sex with 9 men, but Jennie is HIV positive.The film seems to have a documentary feel to it, because a lot of the dialogues seem improvised. The movie takes place in the course of a day, and primarily focus' on Jennie searching for Telly to tell him that they both have HIV, while Telly engages in scandalous actions. She seems to show up at places where Telly just was, but is too late to catch him. a gang of the boys Telly spends time with This movie gives a glimpse into the lives of recluse teenage boys, suggesting reality. Telly is seen walking around with gangs of other teenage boys, with a few cheaply dressed teenage girls, committing crimes, beating people, flirting, stealing and doing drugs. Jennie seems to be the only "innocent" character, and gradually turns into an emotional mess as the day ensues by drinking. By the end of the night, Jennie finally catches up to Telly, only to find him having sex with another virgin, reminiscent of the beginning scene. "Close the fucking door", he shouts to Jennie without knowing it's her. Without saying anything, Jennie proceeds to cry herself to sleep on the couch, in a living room full of passed out teenagers and beer cans. As the sun rises, Casper rapes Jennie while she's passed out, adding to the over all obscene mood to the movie. There is no resolution, just happenings giving insight to irresponsible teenagers. I feel that it was made to be a wake up call to youths, and not showing much censorship. The films soundtrack consisted of mostly sounds of the city and music playing on the streets, as if a camera man was following these kids without them knowing, adding to the authenticity to the film. The authenticity makes it shocking, and an all in all depressing yet insightful movie.

Blair Witch Project

Despite it's popularity in 1999, it was not until recently that I watched the independent horror film, "The Blair Witch Project," written and directed by Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez. The film is shot as if it is a real life documentary/video diary of three college students named, Heather, Josh, and Michael (the actors real names are used). Heathers character is a young film maker who brings two peers, Josh and Michael along with her to film a documentary on the Blair Witch. The location is in the fictitious town Berkitsville, Maryland, formally known as Blair. They are exploring the myth of the Blair witch who was supposedly the cause of hundreds of missing children, and dead tortured people found in a wooded area where the "witch" resided. Before heading into the infamous woodland, they go around the town interviewing people of the town on what they know about the Blair Witch. The film has sudden cuts and random shots between the interviews, i.e. the three of them cracking jokes at the grocery store. This gives the audience a sense of confusion, "Is this real?" Although in 2012, we are now used to fake reality shows and movies, but in 1999 this film probably lead some people to wonder if this was indeed a documentary of three college students that went missing, and this was the footage left behind. Because of this sense of "reality" it may have contributed to the suspense and popularity of the film. Unlike most horror films, a lot is left to the imagination for a majority of the film is the three students reactions to being lost in the woods, and hearing suspicious noises at night. The witch is never shown, but as each night passes, the three discover clues around their tent that the witch has been watching them. The subtlety adds to the fright. By the 6th night, Heather and Mike awake without any sign of Josh. The next two nights, they only hear his voice calling for help amidst the pitch black. By the last night, Heather and Mike try to follow his screams and come across an abandoned shack they did not notice before. It wasn't until they reached the basement of the shack that Heather starts screaming and Mike drops the camera. Heathers camera drops at the very end too implying the Blair Witch killed her. Mike being turned against the wall while Heather is being murdered. Earlier one of the interviewees said the Blair Witch would make some of her victims face the wall while murdering another person. This shot is seen right before Heather dies. The audience never sees the witch. This is where the movie ends. In most of the film, Heather is holding the camera, and shooting the two men, while carrying on a dialogue. In the beginning they crack jokes. i.e. Heather zooms in on a dead mouse in the woods and says, "What killed this mouse, witch craft?" The film continues into stressful situations where the two men are yelling at Heather because they are lost, and each day becomes more chaotic. The three of them look dirty, tired, and scared as more time passes. In the beginning Mike and Josh used the camera more, and as they realize they may not ever escape the woods, Heather is the only one using the camera, because Josh and Mike are sick of doing the film. Most of the film is shot in black and white, with only a few color shots in the beginning. With the random clips and cuts and unsteadiness of the camera, it gives an even more of a sense that "this is real raw footage". For it's time, I find this film successful because of the "home video" type look, and the lingering presence of the unseen witch, leaving the audience on the edge of their seats. http://youtu.be/cMQQpmm5u3w

The Invisible (2007)

I watched the PG-13 crime and fantasy film, "The Invisible" written by Mick Davis (screenplay) and Christine Roum, directed by David S. Goyer. The film is about an intelligent 18 year old boy named Nick who was beaten unconscious by his peer Annie. Annie is from a broken home and does not seem to have any regard for anyone else in her life except for her little brother. Nick is close to death but is not completely dead, so his soul wanders around without being noticed. Annie must tell the police where his body is before he dies. Nicks soul follows Annie in hopes she will hear his pleadings to save him, which she finally does and in the process, she herself dies. and example of the close spaces in the film The shots in the film have various close ups and interesting angles of Annie and Nick to reveal an intimate portrayal of each life they lead, and what they are feeling at that moment in time. One of the challenges was to portray Nick as a ghost rather than a human, and how the actors had to pretend he wasn't in their presence. Most actors seemed to have pulled it off, despite from where the actress playing Annie looks into his face a couple of times. Nick's soul with Annie, in the process of trying to communicate somehow. Even though I found the plot to be interesting, I felt that the characters were predictable and did not make the best use of their characters. The shots of the film are usually 5-15 seconds each, leading the audience to feel a sense of mystery and suspense. The lighting of the film is dim until Nick is brought back to life. The sun is never shining until his body is found. Most shots take place in small enclosed spaces aside from the woodland area where Nicks body was left, adding to the suspense. It comes off as claustrophobic to the audience, symbolic of Nick being trapped in limbo. In the end when Nick has fully recovered, he is seen talking to Annie's little brother in a wide outdoor space on a sunny day flying a model airplane. This is the only time where the audience feels the sense of freedom and relief because of the bright sun and the wide space, aside from the rest of the film.' Though some of the actors lacked in experience and bored me a little, the movie was shot beautifully and gracefully giving a depressing mood to the film, until the very end. All in all, I would say it was an Ok movie.

Monday, March 26, 2012

A Separation (2011)




This movie is with complication of a separation between husband and wife, and is clearly present from the very start of the film. Over the film, opinions were not hidden but clearly express through words sometimes actions of violence. Social class was also clearly show in the movie, from their living environment to the extra labor work for lower class citizens. The social and religion judgment of behavior between male and female is always in between, and the fear of disapproves from others.

Over the film, it didn’t contain much trick or special affect that catches my eyes; however, between screens are often carry from actors’ eyes to another. And the story itself is full of difficulties and complicated for audience, which is easier to connect with the unfamiliar culture. The movie is also educating foreign viewer of their country, because of such rich information about the culture; I personally was unable to focus on the story itself, but learning the boundaries in their society.

For me, the title of “A Separation” is not only about the separation of one family, also the separation between, male/female, connection, wealth, and class.

Leslie Thornton Articles

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Werckmeister Harmonies (Hungary)

I watched Werckmeister Harmonies directed by Béla Tarr and Ágnes Hranitzky at the Harvard Film Archive. Honestly, I left the film speechless.



The 145 minute black and white film felt like it was made in the 40's, yet it was actually released in 2001. The shots are characterized by slow camera movement, long shots, and symbolic images. The pacing of the film felt very slow and many times the camera would stand still as movement or character entered and left the frame. There were also beautiful shots of dance-like interaction between characters as if the camera was  in the perspective of one of the characters. The photography was incredible, with beautiful details of lights and shadows in almost every shot.

The narrative felt circular in the end, with a couple of shots that mimicked one another and symbolically said more than any dialogue. The film had many moments of silence as well as natural sound. The score was traditional, with a piano and at times a violin playing beautiful melodies that seemed influenced by Hungarian folk music.

I recommend everyone to watch this film. I'm still digesting it.



-Samira

The Hunger Games -Important Portrayal of Violence




This post is going to be about the film techniques that emphasize the interpersonal violence of the games. The movie's large amount of violent killing scenes is important so that viewer's can question why the violence is happening? Why are the kids murdering each other? Why is it a "game"? The kind of violent imagery is important, too. In comparison to what I am used to from action entertainment movies, this is shocking for its intimacy and feelings of humanity and vulnerability. It is more similar to killing depicted in anti-war films where an abundance of slaughter-like murders show the meaninglessness of the violence. It says, "this killing does not support or glorify violent acts."

The early killing scenes included many cuts and medium-close shots. There were no wide shot scanning battle scenes. The camera was up close to the action, even cutting off parts of it, so we could not see the entire action or all of the figures.  The combination of these tight shots of chaotic violence with the constant wavering or jumpy camera movement made these upsetting scenes hard to grasp. I think this worked because the game's systematic murders are so insane, so manipulative and based on censorship and political oppression. 

For the most part The Hunger Games did not do any really interesting things in terms of being a thing composed of moving images. I think that the book and movie's violence are driving forces in its ultimate message of peace, nonviolence, and opposing despotic rule. In these scenes of killing and other violence the filming techniques made the fear and vulnerability come alive.

Friday, March 23, 2012

Heathers (1988) by Michael Lehmann

Heathers is a cult classic from the 80s following a girl, played by Winona Ryder, who attempts to integrate herself into the popular group at school, a clique of three girls all with the same name- Heather. The main character ends up falling for the school bad boy and quickly learns a thing or two about getting away with murder.


The lighting throughout this movie was relatively normal, outdoor sunlight. There are scenes at night, which usually take place under a florescent light, often times because they are inside. There is a scene where a red transparency is used over some of the lights, when Veronica (the main character) is having a dream about the second Heather's funeral and is confronted by the first Heather. The red transparency was used for a few reasons, one being that Heather one always chose to be red whenever they were playing croquet, and another reason was to add to the strange factor of Veronica dreaming about the funeral - so that we would know it wasn't real. There is also a tungsten blue tint to a few scenes, most notably when Veronica is trying to stop J.D from killing the second Heather, which is a dream, and when J.D and Veronica are outside post-sex by the croquet set up. Veronica typically chose to be blue during the croquet matches and I think that choosing to use blue as a tint was a good idea to show Veronica's choices within the story.
Light shift

There are a lot of groupings of threes in shots, especially of the Heathers often times with Veronica in a separate shot despite interacting with the three Veronicas. I think this helps to get across Veronica's alienation from the Heathers, and how deeply different she was from them. This grouping of three also happens when she sits down to eat lunch with her parents and she sits in between them on the patio.

This is the second part of the opening scene, after you see the legs of the Heathers, you see Veronica in the ground.


Michael does a lot with croppings, cropping of the body usually to show the upper half or the lower half. This is evident in the opening scene with the three Heathers walking out in the sun, and then it switches and we see their lower legs as they begin playing croquet. This same cropping, minus the feet, happens when Veronica is walking through the halls at school and when the Heathers convince Veronica to write a fake love letter for laughs.


He pans across the body in a few scenes, most notably after J.D. and Veronica have sex for the first time, outside by the croquet set up. The scene begins as it pans across the clothes strewn about and ends up traveling from their legs up to their faces- however, the entire time you hear their voices which seem almost disembodied at the time, until the camera settles on the couple.
Whenever there is a character chasing another character, the camera remains stationary as the characters run through the frames.


He also uses repetition of action within the piece, most notably the consistency with which Veronica sits down with her parents in the same way out on the patio- it almost appears that it is the exact scene from before, even her parents ask similar questions, but Veronica's excuse for leaving early changes each time. The croquet set pops up a few times throughout the film, because each girl has her own signifying color - and in some ways personifies the competitive feelings they have toward one another. They also repeat part of the opening scene, where it flashes to Heather's feet as she hits the ball, except this time it's Veronica and a childhood friend of hers. A girl that Veronica tries to reconnect with after she begins to realize how useless it is to try to belong to the clique of Heathers.

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Wristcutters: A Love Story (2006, director: Goran Dukic)


This film is based on Etgar Keret's short story "Kneller's Happy Campers", and according to Wikipedia the film was initially supposed to be shot on Kodak's 16mm Ektachrome Film, which turned out to be too time-consuming in the process.
The film shows us a different kind of dimension, where people go when they have "off-ed", commited suicide. Everything looks more dusty, paler and sadder in this place. There is a blue-ish tint to the images.
People keep on "living" in this place, they eat and work, they have relationships, but no one smiles. Except for some people's clothes (the same they wore when they killed themselves) there are no bright colours, or flowers. We hardly see any water, but mostly desert and deserted places. The camera pans calmly over the dry landscape, there are many still shots (I think they always have people in them, though) and a filter was used to suck out strong contrasts. Also I believe that shooting in a desert area like this with strong sunlight will naturally cause washed-out colours.
 
The film is held together by the death and re-awakening of the main character Zia, and inbetween we are lead by a roadtrip in which Zia tries to find his ex-girlfriend because of whom he killed himself in the first place. His friend Eugene doesn't have anything better to do than drive him, and Mikal, a hitch-hiker they pick up on the way is looking for a way out of this place, because she got there by mistake.
Most people seem lost in their state of being, but a few are looking for some kind of happiness in this place, for a friend or a lover, or a "miracle" that will take their minds off of their purposeless lives, of this forlorn place. Each person has some kind of baggage, is sad because of something, is broken in some kind of way.
A metaphor for this state of being are the ever-returning images of half-sunken used furniture in the sand, broken down cars and torn and shattered houses. We frequently see them when Eugene's car passes through the scenery, and the broken objects usually stand between the camera and the road, so the shot consists of a pan across the trash and wasteland, while following the car. I enjoyed these and other poetic details a lot, as well as the characters attempts to bring some humour into this place, ironically without being able to laugh.









- Nicole



Saturday, March 17, 2012

Heavenly Creatures



Heavenly Creatures is a 1994 film directed by Peter Jackson, from a screenplay he co-wrote with his wife Fran Walsh, about the notorious 1954 Parker–Hulme murder case in Christchurch, New Zealand.

The film deals with the obsessive relationship between Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme, two teenagers who murdered Parker's mother. The events of the film cover the period from the girls' meeting in early 1953 to the murder in 1954.


The entire film was shot on location in Christchurch city in the South Island of New Zealand. Actually, Jackson has been quoted as saying "Heavenly Creatures is based on a true story, and as such I felt it important to shoot the movie on locations where the actual events took place”.

I really liked this story and the Folie à deux that is related in it. It reminded me of the film Rope of Alfred Hitchcock where a murder is committed by 2 friends (or lovers) who are obsessed with each other.

Actually, I feel like this film was a little bit inspired in Rope and that Fish Child (the film I talked about in my previous post) was inspired in this one. In all this 3 films the subjects are homosexuals couples that are obsessed with each other, and that obsession leads them to commit a murder.



Something that got my attention in this film were the special effects:

The girls' fantasy life, and the "Borovnian" extras (the characters the girls made up) were constructed in over 70 full-sized latex costumes to represent the "Borovnian" crowds. They were plasticine figures that inhabit Pauline and Juliet's magical fantasy world. 

Also, Heavenly Creatures contains over thirty shots that were digitally manipulated ranging from the morphing garden of the "Fourth World," to castles in fields.


  
The film received an Academy Award nomination for Best Original Screenplay.

I recommend people to watch this film, and it is also in Netflix!

Thursday, March 15, 2012